Saturday, July 3, 2010

F.A.Q.

1. Why did you make this site? What is it that you want?
 
I wanted to put my ideas on a public forum and expose them to mixed race people. I am tired of sitting back and letting Negroes, liberal Whites, and status-jockeying minorities beat us up for their own selfish aims. Someone needs to stand up for us, and I think I am just the person to do it.


2. What do you mean by the term "mixed White"?

"Mixed White" refers to a White (or European) person who is of partial African descent. This is not an oxymoron. Since "White" refers to a person of "European heritage", and heritage consists of both race (ancestry) and culture, a person of mixed ancestry can have a predominately European heritage. In my estimation this means being at least half caucasian, culturally European, and having at least a partially caucasian appearance. Other people may have a different opinion. 


3. Are you for freedom of racial identity, even if that means mixed people choosing to be "Black"?

If you mean identifying with Negroes, the Negro experience, or Africa, then absolutely. If you mean labeling themselves as "Black" or "African American", then absolutely. This is supposing that the aforementioned are legitimate choices made without coercion. However, if you mean pretending they are racially Negro, or culturally African, then NO. Such lies are unacceptable because they enforce the White Purity doctrine.


4. Why do you blame Negroes for the problems of mixed Whites? Aren't racist Whites to blame?

Which racists Whites? Contrary to the Negro and liberal propaganda, America is not a seething bed of White racial hatred. Over half of mixed people marry Whites. There is little discrimination in employment. In 2004, there were an estimated fewer than 409 hate crimes against mixed people, including mixed "Blacks". The hate crime incident rate against Jews was twice as high, and the chances of dying in a car crash were 1.4 times higher.  Regular Whites are not prepared to defend "White Purity", let alone with violence. The only people who are ready to do this, are Negroes, liberal Whites, and status-jockeying minorities. The root of the modern problem lies in their agenda. These people have a collective interest in: (a) undermining White identity and culture, (b) empowering Negroes and other minorities, and (c) absolving "good Whites" of guilt for America's race problem. They cede to Negroes the authority to decide racial etiquette, laud the abuse of mixed-race Whites as "progressive" and "anti-racist", and hide behind Negroes so they don't have to take responsibility for their ideology. Negroes are at the fore front of the problem. Without their official and vigorous support, the White Purity doctrine would crumble into dust.

Specifically, Negroes and the mixed "Black" elite...

1. Publicly act as moral authorities on racial matters, using books, magazines, school cirricula, newspapers, television, the radio, and the internet, to instruct Americans that mixed-Whites are not good enough for their White heritage.

2. Brainwash mixed Whites into believing they are too inferior for their White heritage, that Whites will never accept them, and that they owe their loyalty to Negroes.

3. Act as spokespeople for mixed race people without their consent.

4. Demand racial allegiance from mixed Whites in the public media, while threatening Whites with the "racist" label should they come to their aide.

5. Slander mixed people as ungrateful, cowardly, self-hating, and racist, because they reject a Black identity. This race-policing takes place in real life, the traditional media, and on numerous internet forums which Negroes stalk.

6. Intimidate mixed people with threats of physical violence.

7. Commit acts of physical violence (hate-crimes) against mixed people who reject a Black identity.

8. Steal the accomplishments, physical appearance, and history of mixed people for their own (i.e. tar-brushing historical figures, parading mixed women in Negro magazines, talk-shows, rap videos, and so forth, etc.). This gives the impression that mixed people are inept, and genetically undifferentiated from Negroes, hence less White.

9. Promulgate the lie that mixed people and Negroes have equally bad social characteristics (e.g. school performance, educational attainment, aptitude test scores, employment rate, well-fare rate, incarceration rate, poverty rate, community type, family environment, etc.). This psychologically transfers the poor performance of Negroes onto mixed Whites, and reinforces the implicit belief among Whites that African blood is inherently degrading.

If Negroes aren't to blame, then what are they so afraid of? No other ethnic group takes such extreme lengths to forcibly acquire people that reject them. Something is wrong here. If Whites are really to blame for our problem, then why is the face of the problem nearly always Black? Why don't they stay out of our affairs and let the Whites reject us, slander us, and abuse us on their own? It's because they know Whites won't do it.

Lastly, I want to point out that Negroes themselves are actually the pawns of the "Mulatto Elite", a caste of mixed White persons which inhabits the upper echelons of the Black community. These people are the legacy of the old mixed White community which did not historically identify as "Black". Eventually they accepted a special position as the "best of the Negroes" in the early 20th century, and now in post civil rights America, they fear losing their exalted status. They so internalized their own degradation that they feel undeserving of their White heritage. At the same time, they fear losing the "precious" White blood they adore and turning into Negroes if any of it escapes their community. In a bitter irony, they secretly despise Blacks as much as the Klan, but depend on them for economic subsistence and social prestige. They are the ultimate parasite, and they have duped Negro America into serving their interests rather than its own. 


6. Why don't you blame White people for the problems of mixed Whites? Don't they have all the power?

Which Whites have the power? The average WASP isn't interested in defending the White race from "invading" Negro blood. What's more, if they did care what could they do about it? White identity is politically incorrect, White culture is anathema, and White agitation is an anachronism. The new White power structure in America is liberal, anti-White, radical, and working together with minorities to establish a multicultural society. I do blame these White people. I have said numerous times that they are the shadowy partners of the Black Unity fanatics. Their power, however, comes from the moral legitimacy which society cedes to Negroes. When confronted directly, they point to Negroes and reply: "you can't be White because they said so!".

Specifically, liberal Whites....

1. Convince the White community that Negroes (and their White allies) are the moral authority on racial matters, particularly as they relate to social justice.

2. Silence discussion on racial differences in order to maintain the myth that Negroes and Whites are equally capable, and that disparities are attributable to "racism". The result is that people form inaccurate opinions about racial differences, and mixed race people suffer the consequences of fallacious stereotyping.

3. Vigorously enforce the custom of hypodescent (identifying mixed Whites as non-Whites), instruct regular Whites in the White purity mythology, and accuse challengers of being "racist".

4. Brainwash their mixed-race children to believe in the White purity doctrine.

5. Give vociferous permission to Negroes to openly attack the heritage and identity of mixed race people, even with racist assaults that would never be tolerated from Caucasians or Mulattoes. 


 7. Why do you use the term "Negro" to describe Black people?

Because the terms "Black" and "African American" are politicized and in certain contexts can refer to people of any race. The term "Negro" more closely refers to a person of typological negroid race.


8. Are you a racist? Is this a White Supremacist site?

No I am not a "racist", and no this is not a "White Supremacist" site. Nowadays people throw the term "racist" around like confetti, without the slightest notion as to what it actually means. A "racist" believes that human races are incompatible and cannot participate in the same society as equals. This is because, to the racist mind, all members of a race possess the same intrinsic human nature or "folk spirit", and these natures are irreconcilable with one another. Consequently, interracial contact under the condition of equality results in disaster. I do not advocate this sort of nonsense. The romantic notion of racial "spirit" is scientifically bunk.


9. Isn't it racist to mention "racial IQ differences", or that "Negroes want to improve their race with White genes"?

No it is not racist. Sadly, in today's society it is taboo to mention the truth about race and mental ability. Look, no scientist disputes the existence of IQ differences between human races. The point of contention, is what causes these differences. Are they environmental, genetic, or both? Personally, I could care less what the causes are. What matters to me, is how the suspicion that the differences are genetic, affects mixed race Whites. It is critical to point out the facts as they stand, because this is the only way to challenge White Supremacist assumptions about mixed Whites. It is also necessary to expose the racial jealousy and White Supremacist thinking, which underlies the behavior of Negroes and liberal Whites, respectively.


10. Why are you against multiculturalism? Isn't that racist?

No it is not racist. Multiculturalism is an anti-White farce perpetuated by Negroes and other minorities who want a bigger piece of the pie. It has nothing to do with equality or tolerance. It's sole goal is to delegitimate Whiteness and replace White America with a multiracial, multicultural hodgepodge of ethnic groups, all vying for political and social hegemony. Multiculturalism is absolutely antithetical to White identity. Paradoxically, it is also the primary driver of the White Purity Doctrine, because Negroes, guilt-ridden White liberals, and status jockeying minorities, use it as a smoke screen to attack mixed Whites for their own ends. They don't care if they reinforce White Supremacy in achieving their goals, because it is a dead doctrine, and the only people who suffer from its rhetoric are the same people they are victimizing.

TragicNegroes Blog

Insightful reading over at TragicNegroes blog. Enjoy!

http://tragicnegroes.wordpress.com/