Thursday, July 15, 2010

The Problem With the Belief in Negro Inferiority

There is a delusion that we can undo racial disparities by simply pretending that they are either non-existent or entirely the fault of White people. Such a solution is utterly unfeasible. Maybe the differences are due at least partially to genetic factors, or perhaps they are entirely environmental. But, anyone who has reviewed the literature on Negro-White differences knows that environmental theories are suspect at best. So, considering the weakness of the environmental hypothesis, we are left with a serious problem. How do we convince Whites that the relative inferiority of Negroes (for certain measures) is totally environmental? The answer is that we cannot, at least until more data accumulates which will vindicate the negro race. Whites and even Negroes themselves (who are committed to a belief in their own inferiority) will continue to suspect that racial disparities are at least partly hereditary. This is the truth, and no political dogma will obfuscate it.

What does this mean for mixed Whites? Unfortunately, as long as the politically correct dogma denies the existence of racial disparities, or blames them on "racist" oppression (which nobody really buys), people will simply form their own assumptions in private. That means they will stereotype mixed Whites in an unfriendly fashion. We cannot afford for this to happen, because our acceptance in the White community is directly proportional to the belief that we possess genuine European qualities. If race differences are not going away (and they aren't anytime soon), then we need Whites to understand the facts, and we need to clearly distinguish our traits from those of Negroes. There is no other viable option for us. However, there are those in the country who want to maintain the status quo. Negroes and White liberals have an invested interest in silencing discussion on racial differences. Originally in the 1960's such discussion was normative among educators and psychologists. But, when Negroes failed to close the achievement gap in the 1970's, experts gradually adopted the position that investigation of group differences was "part of the problem", and implemented a moratorium on race research. Of course, the tacit admission is that race differences are real, partly genetic, and immutable. People simply refuse to acknowledge this hypocrisy and employ rhetorical devices to silence dissent.

Now, perhaps the reader doubts that there is a pervasive belief in the racial inferiority of Negroes (and mixed race people). After all, hate crimes are infrequent, Whites are tolerant of minorities, and intermarriage is higher than ever before. But overt hatred is not the problem which confronts us, implicit beliefs and covert prejudice are the matter of concern. To investigate the belief in Negro and mixed-race inferiority, I conducted a survey in a popular internet chat room with mostly young adult and teenage users. I asked 138 people if they were White Americans, and willing to answer my poll. I acquired 25 respondents. The average age was 17.2, with a range from 14 - 22 years old. 56% of respondents were male, and 44% were female. I asked each respondent the following question:
"Psychologists have found that White Americans score 100 on IQ tests, Mulattoes score 94, and Blacks score 83. The Lowest European country scores 92. The highest African country scores 78. With which of the following do you MOST agree? (a) The differences are entirely genetic. (b) The differences are both environmental and genetic. (c) The differences are entirely environmental."
The results confirmed my claim that there is a pervasive belief in biological Negro inferiority. While few of the respondents indicated overt hostility towards either Negroes or Mulattoes, 52% replied that intelligence differences between the races were at least partly genetic. 20% said they were entirely genetic, and 32% believed they were both environmental and hereditary. Only 48% of respondents replied that intelligence differences were entirely environmental. These results also match similar attitude polls conducted on journalists, editors, and psychometricians. See the following example from Snyderman and Rothman's The IQ Controversy (1989).



Of course there is the objection that such polls simply instruct "racism" rather than measure it. However, this is unlikely because racial disparities, while taboo, are far from secret. Race differences in scholastic aptitude are common knowledge, and racial disparities in crime rates and historical development, are familiar even to children. Given the evidence, it is obvious that the multicultural dogma succeeded in silencing discussion on race differences, but failed to expunge an entrenched belief in White Superiority.

This is the situation, and the pertinent question is what to do about it? Even if it were possible to convince Whites that Negroes are not inferior, it's unlikely that we could succeed where the entire society has failed for over 50 years. This is assuming that we believe in equality ourselves. Realistically, many of us do not agree, which complicates the problem even further. For these reasons, it seems to me that it is a mistake to define mixed race ability as a dependent of that of Negroes. It's a losing battle, not to mention an unnecessary one.

Firstly, biracials are not an inherent "type", but a hybrid whose qualities depend entirely on those of the parents. Importantly, mating between Whites and Negroes is assortative rather than random. Most Negro parents are middle class and educated, while White parents are from a middle class background, educated, but low earning. Consequently, the average properties of Caucasians and Negroes are irrelevant to the characteristics of the Biracial population. Superior Negro parents crossed with superior Caucasian parents, will produce superior biracial offspring. The converse is also true. Second, whatever dysgenesis actually occurs in present interracial matings, the average properties of the mixed race offspring are within the European range. The mean IQ of mulattoes with White mothers (75% of all mulattoes) is 94. The mean IQ of all Biracials is 92. For comparison, the IQ of White Americans is 100, Ireland is 94, Greece is 93, and Croatia is 92. But, so long as intelligence differences are "dogmatized" out of existence by Negroes and White liberals, people will continue to form stereotypical and inaccurate opinions about the relative abilities of pure Caucasians, Mulattoes, and Negroes. They will mistakenly believe that Caucasians are uniform and collectively superior to Mulattoes. They will misjudge the size of the existing differences, and they will attribute the disparity to "racial essence" rather than mating type. For this reason, as long as Negroes are underachieving, mixed Whites cannot afford for people to falsely perceive us as average racial crosses. We must publicize the facts on racial disparities and exonerate ourselves.

Saturday, July 3, 2010

F.A.Q.

1. Why did you make this site? What is it that you want?
 
I wanted to put my ideas on a public forum and expose them to mixed race people. I am tired of sitting back and letting Negroes, liberal Whites, and status-jockeying minorities beat us up for their own selfish aims. Someone needs to stand up for us, and I think I am just the person to do it.


2. What do you mean by the term "mixed White"?

"Mixed White" refers to a White (or European) person who is of partial African descent. This is not an oxymoron. Since "White" refers to a person of "European heritage", and heritage consists of both race (ancestry) and culture, a person of mixed ancestry can have a predominately European heritage. In my estimation this means being at least half caucasian, culturally European, and having at least a partially caucasian appearance. Other people may have a different opinion. 


3. Are you for freedom of racial identity, even if that means mixed people choosing to be "Black"?

If you mean identifying with Negroes, the Negro experience, or Africa, then absolutely. If you mean labeling themselves as "Black" or "African American", then absolutely. This is supposing that the aforementioned are legitimate choices made without coercion. However, if you mean pretending they are racially Negro, or culturally African, then NO. Such lies are unacceptable because they enforce the White Purity doctrine.


4. Why do you blame Negroes for the problems of mixed Whites? Aren't racist Whites to blame?

Which racists Whites? Contrary to the Negro and liberal propaganda, America is not a seething bed of White racial hatred. Over half of mixed people marry Whites. There is little discrimination in employment. In 2004, there were an estimated fewer than 409 hate crimes against mixed people, including mixed "Blacks". The hate crime incident rate against Jews was twice as high, and the chances of dying in a car crash were 1.4 times higher.  Regular Whites are not prepared to defend "White Purity", let alone with violence. The only people who are ready to do this, are Negroes, liberal Whites, and status-jockeying minorities. The root of the modern problem lies in their agenda. These people have a collective interest in: (a) undermining White identity and culture, (b) empowering Negroes and other minorities, and (c) absolving "good Whites" of guilt for America's race problem. They cede to Negroes the authority to decide racial etiquette, laud the abuse of mixed-race Whites as "progressive" and "anti-racist", and hide behind Negroes so they don't have to take responsibility for their ideology. Negroes are at the fore front of the problem. Without their official and vigorous support, the White Purity doctrine would crumble into dust.

Specifically, Negroes and the mixed "Black" elite...

1. Publicly act as moral authorities on racial matters, using books, magazines, school cirricula, newspapers, television, the radio, and the internet, to instruct Americans that mixed-Whites are not good enough for their White heritage.

2. Brainwash mixed Whites into believing they are too inferior for their White heritage, that Whites will never accept them, and that they owe their loyalty to Negroes.

3. Act as spokespeople for mixed race people without their consent.

4. Demand racial allegiance from mixed Whites in the public media, while threatening Whites with the "racist" label should they come to their aide.

5. Slander mixed people as ungrateful, cowardly, self-hating, and racist, because they reject a Black identity. This race-policing takes place in real life, the traditional media, and on numerous internet forums which Negroes stalk.

6. Intimidate mixed people with threats of physical violence.

7. Commit acts of physical violence (hate-crimes) against mixed people who reject a Black identity.

8. Steal the accomplishments, physical appearance, and history of mixed people for their own (i.e. tar-brushing historical figures, parading mixed women in Negro magazines, talk-shows, rap videos, and so forth, etc.). This gives the impression that mixed people are inept, and genetically undifferentiated from Negroes, hence less White.

9. Promulgate the lie that mixed people and Negroes have equally bad social characteristics (e.g. school performance, educational attainment, aptitude test scores, employment rate, well-fare rate, incarceration rate, poverty rate, community type, family environment, etc.). This psychologically transfers the poor performance of Negroes onto mixed Whites, and reinforces the implicit belief among Whites that African blood is inherently degrading.

If Negroes aren't to blame, then what are they so afraid of? No other ethnic group takes such extreme lengths to forcibly acquire people that reject them. Something is wrong here. If Whites are really to blame for our problem, then why is the face of the problem nearly always Black? Why don't they stay out of our affairs and let the Whites reject us, slander us, and abuse us on their own? It's because they know Whites won't do it.

Lastly, I want to point out that Negroes themselves are actually the pawns of the "Mulatto Elite", a caste of mixed White persons which inhabits the upper echelons of the Black community. These people are the legacy of the old mixed White community which did not historically identify as "Black". Eventually they accepted a special position as the "best of the Negroes" in the early 20th century, and now in post civil rights America, they fear losing their exalted status. They so internalized their own degradation that they feel undeserving of their White heritage. At the same time, they fear losing the "precious" White blood they adore and turning into Negroes if any of it escapes their community. In a bitter irony, they secretly despise Blacks as much as the Klan, but depend on them for economic subsistence and social prestige. They are the ultimate parasite, and they have duped Negro America into serving their interests rather than its own. 


6. Why don't you blame White people for the problems of mixed Whites? Don't they have all the power?

Which Whites have the power? The average WASP isn't interested in defending the White race from "invading" Negro blood. What's more, if they did care what could they do about it? White identity is politically incorrect, White culture is anathema, and White agitation is an anachronism. The new White power structure in America is liberal, anti-White, radical, and working together with minorities to establish a multicultural society. I do blame these White people. I have said numerous times that they are the shadowy partners of the Black Unity fanatics. Their power, however, comes from the moral legitimacy which society cedes to Negroes. When confronted directly, they point to Negroes and reply: "you can't be White because they said so!".

Specifically, liberal Whites....

1. Convince the White community that Negroes (and their White allies) are the moral authority on racial matters, particularly as they relate to social justice.

2. Silence discussion on racial differences in order to maintain the myth that Negroes and Whites are equally capable, and that disparities are attributable to "racism". The result is that people form inaccurate opinions about racial differences, and mixed race people suffer the consequences of fallacious stereotyping.

3. Vigorously enforce the custom of hypodescent (identifying mixed Whites as non-Whites), instruct regular Whites in the White purity mythology, and accuse challengers of being "racist".

4. Brainwash their mixed-race children to believe in the White purity doctrine.

5. Give vociferous permission to Negroes to openly attack the heritage and identity of mixed race people, even with racist assaults that would never be tolerated from Caucasians or Mulattoes. 


 7. Why do you use the term "Negro" to describe Black people?

Because the terms "Black" and "African American" are politicized and in certain contexts can refer to people of any race. The term "Negro" more closely refers to a person of typological negroid race.


8. Are you a racist? Is this a White Supremacist site?

No I am not a "racist", and no this is not a "White Supremacist" site. Nowadays people throw the term "racist" around like confetti, without the slightest notion as to what it actually means. A "racist" believes that human races are incompatible and cannot participate in the same society as equals. This is because, to the racist mind, all members of a race possess the same intrinsic human nature or "folk spirit", and these natures are irreconcilable with one another. Consequently, interracial contact under the condition of equality results in disaster. I do not advocate this sort of nonsense. The romantic notion of racial "spirit" is scientifically bunk.


9. Isn't it racist to mention "racial IQ differences", or that "Negroes want to improve their race with White genes"?

No it is not racist. Sadly, in today's society it is taboo to mention the truth about race and mental ability. Look, no scientist disputes the existence of IQ differences between human races. The point of contention, is what causes these differences. Are they environmental, genetic, or both? Personally, I could care less what the causes are. What matters to me, is how the suspicion that the differences are genetic, affects mixed race Whites. It is critical to point out the facts as they stand, because this is the only way to challenge White Supremacist assumptions about mixed Whites. It is also necessary to expose the racial jealousy and White Supremacist thinking, which underlies the behavior of Negroes and liberal Whites, respectively.


10. Why are you against multiculturalism? Isn't that racist?

No it is not racist. Multiculturalism is an anti-White farce perpetuated by Negroes and other minorities who want a bigger piece of the pie. It has nothing to do with equality or tolerance. It's sole goal is to delegitimate Whiteness and replace White America with a multiracial, multicultural hodgepodge of ethnic groups, all vying for political and social hegemony. Multiculturalism is absolutely antithetical to White identity. Paradoxically, it is also the primary driver of the White Purity Doctrine, because Negroes, guilt-ridden White liberals, and status jockeying minorities, use it as a smoke screen to attack mixed Whites for their own ends. They don't care if they reinforce White Supremacy in achieving their goals, because it is a dead doctrine, and the only people who suffer from its rhetoric are the same people they are victimizing.

TragicNegroes Blog

Insightful reading over at TragicNegroes blog. Enjoy!

http://tragicnegroes.wordpress.com/

Thursday, July 1, 2010

Do White People Accept Us?

Most mixed race people believe that pure Whites will not accept them were they to openly identify as White. This propaganda that it isn't a legitimate option is ubiquitous. Most damagingly, the White parents in interracial relationships embrace this rhetoric virulently. They do so firstly in an effort to appease their black partners, secondly to convince themselves that they are not "racist", and thirdly, because they secretly agree with the White Purity doctrine, and hiding behind the smokescreen of "supporting Blacks" is a convenient farce. Ironically, because they fear the specter of White Supremacy, liberal Whites actually utilize their own implicit racist beliefs in defense of the egalitarian world-view. Conservative Whites are more likely to accept mixed race people than liberals, because they do not have the same fanatical "commitment" to racial egalitarianism. This results in their adopting more realistic and fair attitudes towards race relations. They are willing, to some extent, to challenge their own racist attitudes, and they are impressed by pro-White attitudes in mixed people. On the other hand, White identity terrifies and appalls liberals, and rightfully so. After all, they despise themselves for being White and for secretly feeling superior to Blacks. It's only natural that they should harbor such animosity towards their fellow mixed race Whites.

I want to share some conversations with White American chat room users, that took place in June 2010. You will see from these transcripts that the "rejection myth" is a fraud. Without an explicit affirmation of White Supremacy, there is no way to legitimate the White Purity Mythology. Consequently, many White people are able to see our reasoning, and DO indeed accept us, if given the chance. I tell everyone in my personal life that I am White when they first ask me about my ethnicity. Few Whites argue, and the ones who do are Negrophiles. If you doubt the veracity of my assertions, see for yourself: Go out and try it in real life. You will find that few Whites will argue. This is NOT because they secretly think you are a "nigger", as Blacks claim. It's because they aren't committed to rejecting you. Furthermore, with a simple explanation (should the need ever arise, and it doesn't often), most are easily convinced. I know this for a fact, because on several occasions I have done just this (in real life), and successfully made my point. In the chat rooms, I convinced eight out of the nine people I spoke to. So much for the "Whites will never accept you" nonsense Blacks taut

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------    
[soccerandturf]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[curious2no] Hey are you White, and if so, can I ask you a question about race?

[soccerandturf]  ya and yep

[curious2no] Okay, I want to see if I can convince you that Biracials (white/black) can be "White".

[soccerandturf]  alright

[soccerandturf]  go for it

[curious2no] ok, just hear it all out ill say when im done

[soccerandturf]  alright

[curious2no]  1. "white" means a "person of european heritage"

[curious2no]  2. heritage means race and culture put together. If a person has mostly White heritage
   then they are White, that is they are European.

[curious2no]  3. Some biracials have a White parent and a Black a parent, but a totally White culture.

[curious2no]  4. Therefore they are mostly European by heritage, and therefore they are White.

[curious2no] done

[soccerandturf] well you've convinced me

[curious2no] lol, that was easy

[curious2no]  XD

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[Stephen13]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  
[curious2no] Hey are you White, and if so, can I ask you a question about race?

[Stephen13]  i am very white yes

[curious2no] ok, im going to convince you that biracials can be white

[Stephen13]  what

[curious2no] that a person who is half black and half white, can still be white

[Stephen13]  oooh

[Stephen13]  okay

[Stephen13]  shoot

[curious2no] ok man, just hear it all out, and ill say when im finished

[Stephen13]  ok

[curious2no]  1. "white" means a person of "european heritage"

[curious2no]  2. "heritage" means both culture and race put together.

[Stephen13]  yup

[curious2no]  3. if your heritage is mostly European, you are a White person.

[curious2no]  4. some biracials (white/black) have 100% european culture, or White culture.

[curious2no]  5. Therefore their heritage is mostly european, therefore they are White.

[curious2no] done

[Stephen13]  well you made some pretty convincing points

[curious2no] do you agree with my argument?

[Stephen13]  yup

[curious2no] cool, thanks for your time

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[Stephen045]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[curious2no] Hey are you White, and if so, can I ask you a question about race?

[Stephen045]  umm yes i am white. and yes you can. just
  know that i have puerto rican family. dont piss me off.

[Stephen045]  whats your question?

[curious2no] lmao dont worry i wont

[curious2no] Okay, I want to see if I can convince you that Biracials (white/black) can
  be "White". Hear my argument out, ill say when im finished.

[Stephen045]  umm im not following.

[Stephen045]  please elaborate.

[curious2no] with pleasure

[curious2no]  1. "white" means a person of european heritage.

[curious2no]  2. "heritage" depends on both race and culture.

[curious2no]  3. if your heritage is mostly white, then you are white.

[curious2no]  4. some biracials (white/black) have totally White culture.

[curious2no]  5. therefore, they are mostly White in heritage, therefore, they are White.

[curious2no] done

[Stephen045]  well i follow what your saying..my sister who is german and white married a man
    who is of puerto rican descent. so therefore my niece and nephew are biracial. however they are
    encouraged to embrace both the white and the spanish aspects of their lives...so what would that make them?

[curious2no] in that case I would say they are mixed

[curious2no] because they inherited both heritages

[curious2no] if they were raised only White, they would be White

[Stephen045]  oh ok yeah i totally follow what your saying.

[Stephen045]  i agree.

[curious2no] ok, thanks for your time man, see you

[Stephen045]  its all about there upbringing is basically what your saying. i agree.

[curious2no] yea

[Stephen045]  k bye.

[curious2no] thats what i mean

[curious2no] laters

[curious2no] XD

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[alex255]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
 
[curious2no] Hey are you White, and if so, can I ask you a question about race?

[alex255] yea?

[curious2no] Okay, I want to see if I can convince you that Biracials (white/black) can be "White".

[alex255] how?

[curious2no] k here goes my argument, ill say when im done.

[curious2no]  1. "white" means a person of european heritage.

[curious2no]  2. "heritage" depends on both race and culture.

[curious2no]  3. if your heritage is mostly white, then you are white.

[curious2no]  4. some biracials (white/black) have totally White culture.

[curious2no]  5. therefore their heritage is mostly White, therefore they are White.

[curious2no] done.

[alex255] ok

[curious2no] k, so do you agree?

[alex255] yea

[curious2no] ok thanks a lot, thats all I wanted to know

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[BrettHammilton06]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[curious2no]  Hey are you White, and if so, can I ask you a question about race?

[BrettHammilton06]  yes and sure

[curious2no] Okay, I want to see if I can convince you that Biracials

    (white/black) can be "White". Here my argument out, ill say when im finished.

[curious2no]  1. "white" means a person of european heritage.

[curious2no]  2. "heritage" depends on both race (ancestry) and culture.

[curious2no]  3. if your heritage is mostly white, then you are white.

[curious2no]  4. some biracials (white/black) have totally White culture.

[curious2no]  5. therefore their heritage is mostly White, therefore they are White.

[curious2no] finished

[curious2no] so do you agree?

[BrettHammilton06]  not true ur part white not full white and will probably
    never be viewed as such put u get partial credit :)

[curious2no]  do you dispute that such people are culturally White?

[BrettHammilton06]  me no but im not the one to be convinced

[curious2no]  okay, im just talking about YOU, not what society thinks

[curious2no]  are you convinced?

[BrettHammilton06]  fuck society

[curious2no]  exactly

[BrettHammilton06]  and if thats the case u could say im part black or
    some shit cause i love weed watermelon and coolaid Fuck!

[curious2no]  lol

[curious2no]  well do you get my logic though?

[BrettHammilton06]  yeah

[BrettHammilton06]  but youll always get ignorant people to debate that shit

[curious2no]  and so you agree that Biracials can be White if their
    culture is White and they were raised that way, REGARDLESS OF
    WHAT SOCIETY SAYS?

[BrettHammilton06]  culturley sure

[curious2no]  i mean in terms of heritage

[curious2no]  overall heritage

[BrettHammilton06]  yeah id agree

[curious2no]  i dont simply mean culture

[curious2no]  i mean heritage, which is a combination of culture and race

[curious2no]  overall

[curious2no]  not saying they are pure, im just saying they are OVERALL European

[curious2no]  clear?

[BrettHammilton06]  heritage wise u probably wouldnt be considered white or black

[BrettHammilton06]  u have two different cultures

[curious2no]  ok i dont care what people think though, i mean what YOU think

[curious2no]  do you agree with my assertion?

[BrettHammilton06]  the white side and the black or mexican or whatever

[BrettHammilton06]  that ur compleatly white?

[BrettHammilton06]  id have to say no cause thats just not the case

[curious2no]  let me put my assertion to you again, hold on

[BrettHammilton06]  ok

[curious2no]  I said a White person is someone of "European heritage"

[curious2no]  and that this means both culture and race

[curious2no]  and that some biracials are 100% culturally White

[curious2no]  even though they have a black parent

[curious2no]  and that therefore, they are European in heritage, overall, or predominately

[curious2no]  and that therefore they are White people, or European people.

[curious2no]  that is my argument

[BrettHammilton06]  yeah

[curious2no]  ah, so you agree with me?

[BrettHammilton06]  sure u make a good point

[curious2no]  lol thanks bro

[BrettHammilton06]  no prob

[curious2no]  that's all I wanted to know, I appreciate your time

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[trackstar187]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

[curious2no] Hey are you White, and if so, can I ask you a question about race?

[trackstar187]  yeah im white

[curious2no] Okay, I want to see if I can convince you that Biracials

    (white/black) can be "White". Hear my argument out, ill say when im finished.

[curious2no]  1. "white" means a person of european heritage.

[curious2no]  2. "heritage" depends on both race (ancestry) and culture.

[curious2no]  3. if your heritage is mostly white, then you are white.

[curious2no]  4. some biracials (white/black) have totally White culture.

[curious2no]  5. therefore their heritage is mostly White, therefore they are White.

[curious2no] done

[curious2no] Have I convinced you?

[trackstar187]  yeah

[curious2no] ok cool, thanks for your time man.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[Ak-411]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

...[beginning of the conversation was lost]...

[Ak-411]  yeah i agree for sure dude!

[curious2no]    ok, for the record, you agree that a Biracial person who is half White and half Black genetically,  if they are raised 100% culturally White, can be a "White person" or a "European person"? And you yourself are a White person?

[Ak-411]  lol yeah! dude do you smoke weed cuz thats a total stoner
    convo! you could go on for like hours just discussing this! yes i am a white
    person!

[curious2no] XD, i appreciate the help

[Ak-411]  Yeah no problem!

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------